Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited
Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 15 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 71.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 28.6% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited has been represented by 6 law firms and 15 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Virtus Law LLP | 1 case |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
Rajah & Tann LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.3
- Complex Cases
- 2 (28.6%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 56.4 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 13.0 parties avg |
2023 | 13.0 parties avg |
2022 | 13.0 parties avg |
2019 | 12.0 parties avg |
2018 | 12.0 parties avg |
2017 | 212.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(14.3%) |
Neutral | 1(14.3%) |
Won | 5(71.4%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 128,125.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 1 1 |
2023 | 1 1 |
2022 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
20 Aug 2024 | Respondent, Defendant | WonAppeal dismissed in favour of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 Aug 2023 | Defendant | WonJudgment in favour of Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited as the Fraud Exception was established. |
26 Sep 2022 | Plaintiff, Respondent | LostThe appeal against the decision of the Assistant Registrar was allowed, and the orders made by the AR below were set aside. |
17 Jul 2019 | Plaintiff | NeutralApplication adjourned to be heard together with any application for the winding-up order to be set aside. |
03 Jan 2018 | Defendant | WonJudgment in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of S$384,375 to the defendant on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 May 2017 | Plaintiff, Applicant | WonSummonses Nos 1304 and 1305 of 2017 are granted, allowing Standard Chartered Bank (Singapore) Limited to enforce the orders it obtained in 2007. |
01 Mar 2017 | Defendant | WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |