Tan Huat Chye
Tan Huat Chye is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 44.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 9 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Huat Chye has been represented by 5 law firms and 13 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
JLC Advisors LLP | 1 case |
Rajah & Tann LLP | 2 cases |
Rajah and Tann | 1 case |
Optimus Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Tan Rajah & Cheah LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Huat Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 9.3
- Complex Cases
- 9 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 19.0 parties avg |
Lost | 211.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 19.0 parties avg |
Partial | 19.0 parties avg |
Won | 48.8 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 19.0 parties avg |
2020 | 19.0 parties avg |
2019 | 111.0 parties avg |
2018 | 19.0 parties avg |
2015 | 111.0 parties avg |
2012 | 111.0 parties avg |
2009 | 18.0 parties avg |
2008 | 18.0 parties avg |
2004 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Huat Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 1(11.1%) |
Lost | 2(22.2%) |
Neutral | 1(11.1%) |
Partial | 1(11.1%) |
Won | 4(44.4%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 140,375.004 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2012 | 1 1 |
2009 | 1 1 |
2008 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 9 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
10 Feb 2021 | Defendant | DismissedPlaintiffs' claims against Huat Chye dismissed. |
29 Jul 2020 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
14 Mar 2019 | Defendant | LostLiable for costs of $435,500 jointly and severally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $126,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeal No 171 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2015 | Defendant | LostConsent Order set aside. |
11 Nov 2012 | Defendant | WonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2009 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application to proceed with the bidding process for the shares was granted. |
22 Jun 2008 | Defendant | WonThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed. |
23 Feb 2004 | Defendant | WonPrayers (1) – (3) of SIC 5864 of 2003 were allowed. |