Tan Kim Seng

Tan Kim Seng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tan Kim Seng has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	K Gopalan
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Kannan Ramesh Seetha Ramasamy
Vincent Yeoh & Co	1 case	Vincent Yeoh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Kim Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Neutral	119.0 parties avg	19.0	33.3%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	119.0 parties avg	19.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Kim Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2007-sghc-151 16 Sep 2007	16 Sep 2007	Defendant	LostClaims dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2003-sgca-49 20 Nov 2003	20 Nov 2003	Appellant, Defendant	WonAppeal allowed; the action is deemed discontinued pursuant to O 21 r 2(6). Costs awarded to the appellant, restricted to the application of O 21 r 2. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2001-sghc-278 23 Sep 2001	23 Sep 2001	Defendant	NeutralApplication by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.