Tan Swee Wan

Tan Swee Wan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Tan Swee Wan has been represented by 1 law firm and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Wong Hin Pkin Wendell Tay Eu-Yen Wendell Wong Faith Hwang Zi Xin Wendell Wong Hin Pkin Priscylia Wu Baoyi Alexis Loo Quan Rung Priscylia Wu Lim Yao Jun

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Swee Wan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Swee Wan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-292 12 Oct 2023	12 Oct 2023	Respondent, Defendant	DismissedCounterclaim dismissed; the Swee Wan Indemnity does not exist.
2	2018-sghc-169 25 Jul 2018	25 Jul 2018	Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim	LostClaim dismissed.
3	2016-sghc-206 27 Sep 2016	27 Sep 2016	Plaintiff, Respondent	LostAppeal allowed in favor of the Defendant; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.