The Micro Tellers Network Limited

The Micro Tellers Network Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

The Micro Tellers Network Limited has been represented by 1 law firm and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	Hari Veluri Ong Pei Ching Chin Yen Bing Arthur Tan Gim Hai Adrian S Lingesh Kumar Siah Jiayi Vivian Adrian Tan Feng Chong We Lingesh Kumar Yeoh Jean Ann Joel Lim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of The Micro Tellers Network Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.7
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33.3%
Won	28.5 parties avg	8.5	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of The Micro Tellers Network Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	9,799,221.94	9,799,221.941 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghci-13 05 Sep 2023	05 Sep 2023	Plaintiff	PartialLeave to amend the writ to join Lee Moon Young as a party together with leave to make the amendments to the statement of claim relating to her joinder is granted. Leave to add the three new causes of action is refused.
2	2022-sghcr-1 02 Jan 2022	02 Jan 2022	Respondent	WonSuccessfully opposed the bankruptcy application.
3	2020-sghc-130 23 Jun 2020	23 Jun 2020	Plaintiff	WonApplication for worldwide Mareva injunction against the Defendants’ assets granted up to the value of US$9,799,221.94 (assumed USD, as the judgment refers to amounts in USD).