THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD

THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD has been represented by 1 law firm and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Lok Vi Ming SC Lok Vi Ming Audrey Chiang Audrey Chiang Ju Hua Vanessa Tok Nerissa Tan Calvin Lim Yew Kuan Vanessa Tok Xiu Xian Lim Xiu Zhen Calvin Lim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 3 (75.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%
Won	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of THOMSON MEDICAL PTE LTD's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,500.00	3,750.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-22 05 Apr 2016	05 Apr 2016	Respondent, Defendant	LostAppeal allowed with costs against the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2015-sghc-238 13 Sep 2015	13 Sep 2015	Defendant, Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs of $7,500 (excluding disbursements) to be paid by the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghc-9 14 Jan 2015	14 Jan 2015	Defendant	WonThe court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for the child's upkeep.
4	2014-sghc-36 24 Feb 2014	24 Feb 2014	Defendant	LostThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim for the upkeep of the child was unsuccessful, and the claim was directed to proceed to trial.