Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership)

Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Lu Yanrong Elycia Gitta Priska Adelya Ng Ka Luon Eddee Leong Qianyu Teo Jin Yun Germaine Clarise Chew Shu-Min Eddee Ng Ka Luon
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 case	Kenneth Tan Kenneth Tan SC

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%
Won	26.0 parties avg	6.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	35.3 parties avg	5.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Neutral	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghc-176 09 Jul 2024	09 Jul 2024	Plaintiff	NeutralThe defendant's application to strike out parts of the Statement of Claim was dismissed.
2	2023-sgca-43 29 Nov 2023	29 Nov 2023	Respondent, Appellant	WonAppeal upheld; the court accepted the Omni Undertaking as an adequate form of security. No specific monetary amount was awarded, but costs were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2023-sghc-270 26 Sep 2023	26 Sep 2023	Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the trial judge.
4	2023-sghc-113 27 Apr 2023	27 Apr 2023	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; security for costs to be furnished by way of an undertaking to the court jointly by Omni Bridgeway Limited and Omni Bridgeway (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.