UCO Bank

UCO Bank is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 62.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 12.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

UCO Bank has been represented by 5 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Shook Lin & Bok	2 cases	Sarjit Singh Gill Sarjit Singh Dylan Lee
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 case	Kenneth Tan
T S Oon & Bazul	1 case	Bazul Ashhab Karnan Thirupathy
T S Oon and Bazul	2 cases	Bazul Ashhab Ramesh Tiwari
Shook Lin and Bok	1 case	David Kong Dylan Lee

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of UCO Bank's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (12.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	37.5%
Won	55.2 parties avg	5.2	62.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of UCO Bank's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Won	5(62.5%)	62.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 13	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 3 cases (150.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-38 01 Mar 2017	01 Mar 2017	Defendant	WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2005-sgca-42 13 Sep 2005	13 Sep 2005	Appellant	WonThe appeal was allowed, restoring the action for further hearing.
3	2005-sghc-65 04 Apr 2005	04 Apr 2005	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostThe appeal was dismissed with costs.
4	2004-sghc-185 24 Aug 2004	24 Aug 2004	Plaintiff	LostUCO Bank's application for summary judgment was dismissed, and their action was struck out due to lack of title to sue.
5	2003-sghc-271 30 Oct 2003	30 Oct 2003	Plaintiff	LostThe Plaintiffs' application for a Mareva injunction was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2003-sgca-43 22 Oct 2003	22 Oct 2003	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs.
7	2003-sghc-137 24 Jun 2003	24 Jun 2003	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonPlaintiffs' appeal allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
8	2003-sghc-138 24 Jun 2003	24 Jun 2003	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonPlaintiff's appeal was allowed.