Wan Hoe Keet (Wen Haojie)

Wan Hoe Keet (Wen Haojie) is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Wan Hoe Keet (Wen Haojie) has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	1 case	Lim Yi Zheng Christopher Anand s/o Daniel Harjean Kaur Yeo Yi Ling Eileen Saadhvika Jayanth
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Wong Soon Peng Adrian Ng Tee Tze Allen Timothy Ng Sin Zhan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wan Hoe Keet (Wen Haojie)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wan Hoe Keet (Wen Haojie)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghca-36 16 Nov 2023	16 Nov 2023	Respondent	WonThe court upheld the respondents' position regarding the appeal process.
2	2020-sgca-29 02 Apr 2020	02 Apr 2020	Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.