Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd

Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 4 law firms.

Legal Representation

Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Optimus Chambers LLC	1 case	Lim Bee Li Irving Choh
Eldan Law LLP	1 case	Lawrence Tan Edwin Lee Peng Khoon Lai Yin Ting
M Nedumaran & Co	1 case	Nedumaran Muthukrishnan
Central Chambers Law Corp	1 case	Rajendran Kumaresan Wilfred Goh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.8 parties avg	2.8	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	428,865.05	142,955.023 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2014-sghc-85 22 Apr 2014	22 Apr 2014	Defendant	LostOrdered to be wound up. Owed Tavica Design Pte Ltd S$240,650.95. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2013-sghc-112 21 May 2013	21 May 2013	Defendant	LostDeclaratory judgment awarded to the plaintiff against the first defendant that the SPA has been repudiated. The plaintiff shall have, at its option, final judgment against the first and second defendants in the sum of $94,107.05 with interest (from the date of the writ) and two sets of costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Alternatively, the plaintiff shall have interlocutory judgment (with costs) against both defendants with damages to be assessed by the Registrar with the issue of costs and interest reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2012-sghc-123 06 Jun 2012	06 Jun 2012	Applicant, Appellant	LostWin-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd's application to direct the Law Society to apply to the Chief Justice for the appointment of a Disciplinary Tribunal in respect of its complaint was dismissed with costs.
4	2011-sghc-37 20 Feb 2011	20 Feb 2011	Defendant	LostJudgment against the Defendant; the sum of $94,107.05 which is the balance amount on the progress payments due upon the repudiation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.