Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd)

Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd) has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Gabriel Law Corporation	1 case	Nandwani Manoj Prakash
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Tan Chee Meng Josephine Choo Emily Su
Donaldson & Burkinshaw	1 case	Kang Yixian Eric Tin Keng Seng Gooi Chi Duan Jessica Soo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.7
Complex Cases: 2 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	66.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Xing Rong Pte Ltd (formerly known as Huadi Projects Pte Ltd)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,128,000.00	1,064,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2013-sgca-47 01 Sep 2013	01 Sep 2013	Respondent, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed. Liable for damages representing S$2.125m. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2010-sgca-30 25 Aug 2010	25 Aug 2010	Appellant	PartialAppeal against the striking out order was allowed, but the appeal against the Assistant Registrar’s decision was dismissed.
3	2010-sghc-78 11 Mar 2010	11 Mar 2010	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal against the AR’s order for discovery was dismissed and ordered to pay $3,000 as costs inclusive of disbursements for the entire hearing to the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.