Yap Jin Meng Bryan

Yap Jin Meng Bryan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 15 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Yap Jin Meng Bryan has been represented by 3 law firms and 15 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yap Jin Meng Bryan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
3.4
Complex Cases
4 (57.1%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost14.0 parties avg
Partial33.3 parties avg
Won33.3 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201712.0 parties avg
201632.7 parties avg
201514.0 parties avg
201314.0 parties avg
201216.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yap Jin Meng Bryan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(14.3%)
Partial3(42.9%)
Won3(42.9%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD598,052.765 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20171
1
20162
12
20151
1
20131
1
20121
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
13 Aug 2017
RespondentPartialAppeal allowed in part. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent the costs of the suit on a standard basis throughout. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24 Nov 2016
DefendantWonThe defendant successfully defended the suit and was awarded costs on a standard basis before 25 February 2016 and on an indemnity basis from that date onwards. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20 Oct 2016
DefendantWonJudgment in favor of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
02 Mar 2016
DefendantPartialInterest of $2,990,263.79 awarded for loan to Riverwealth. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
28 Oct 2015
DefendantPartialEntitled to deduct certain expenses and interest on loan. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21 Jul 2013
RespondentLostAppeal dismissed; misrepresentation claim rejected; oral agreement for profit sharing upheld against him.
06 Aug 2012
DefendantWonThe first defendant was awarded judgment on his counterclaim.