Charter Parties

Charter Parties is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2003 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Charter Parties, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Joseph Tan Jude Benny LLP100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Gurbani & Co.100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Navin & Co LLP0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Charter Parties, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Low Chai Chong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Woo Shu Yan100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Sean Chen0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Cavinder Bull SC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
K Muralitherapany100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Christopher Ong Siu Jin100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Navinder Singh0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jonathan Yap100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wesley Chan100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Daryl Ho100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1NSL Oilchem v Prosper Marine: Contractual Disputes, Breach, and GuaranteesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore28 Sep 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff
2Paragon Shipping v Freight Connect: Charter Party Dispute over Cargo Transport from China to SingaporeHigh Court25 Aug 2014
Judgment for the plaintiff; defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
3Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd v OAS Asia Star: Voyage Charterparty Dispute over Unfit Cargo TanksHigh Court28 Jun 2006
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Balasundaram v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Criminal Breach of Trust Conviction and Enhanced SentenceHigh Court24 Aug 2003
Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentence enhanced to 36 months’ imprisonment, to commence upon expiry of the present sentence the appellant is serving.