Cybercrime
Cybercrime is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2006 to 2022.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Cybercrime, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Deputy Public Prosecutor100.00% success rate | 2 cases50.0% of area |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Law Society’s Criminal Legal Aid Scheme0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Dhillon & Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Cybercrime, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Ong Tun Wei Danny100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| April Phang100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Charlene Tay Chia0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Sadhana Rai0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Chow Chao Wu Jansen100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Yap Zhe You Ryo100.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Hri Kumar Nair0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Abraham S Vergis0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Crystal Tan0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
| Michael Quilindo0.00% success rate | 1 cases25.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLM v CLN: Cryptocurrency Theft, Proprietary Injunction, and Jurisdiction over Unknown Persons | General Division of the High Court | 03 Mar 2022 | Applications in Summons 2444 and Summons 4880 granted. |
| 2 | PP v Mohd Ariffan: Adducing Fresh Evidence on Appeal in Sexual Offence Case | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 13 Feb 2018 | The Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal. |
| 3 | Public Prosecutor v Law Aik Meng: Computer Misuse Act & Penal Code Sentencing in ATM Card Fraud | High Court | 06 Mar 2007 | Appeal Allowed |
| 4 | Navaseelan Balasingam v PP: Computer Misuse & Theft from ATMs - Sentencing Appeal | High Court | 12 Dec 2006 | Appeal Dismissed with sentence enhanced. |