Equitable Recoupment
Equitable Recoupment is a primary practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2022 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Equitable Recoupment, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Shook Lin & Bok LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
PDLegal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Setia Law LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Rajah & Tann LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Malkin & Maxwell LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Harry Elias Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Equitable Recoupment, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Axl Rizqy0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Mak Wei Munn0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Lem Jit Min Andy0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Yam Wern-Jhien100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Ian Mah100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Eric Ng Yuen0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Jenny Lu0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Poh Yee Shing0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Phang Shi Ting0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Sathya Justin Narayanan0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Re Fullerton Capital Ltd: Cross-Border Insolvency & Disclosure Orders | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 17 Jun 2024 | Application allowed in the main |
2 | British and Malayan Trustees Ltd v Ameen Ali Salim Talib: Representation of Interested Persons in Trust Dispute | High Court | 29 Sep 2022 | Application allowed in part; the Group 1 Respondents can represent the 15 beneficiaries who provided written consent. |