Friendly Loans
Friendly Loans is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2003 to 2006.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Friendly Loans, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Mak & Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Andrew Ee & Co100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hee Theng Fong & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee & Tan100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee and Lee100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee Mun Hooi and Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Friendly Loans, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Hee Theng Fong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Julian Tay100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee Mun Hooi0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Mak Kok Weng0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Andrew Ee66.67% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Tan T'eng Ta' Benedict0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Christopher Tan Ming Tatt100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wong Nan Shee0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Lee Cheow Ming Doris Damaris0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hong Guet Eng v Wu Wai Hong: Limitation Act & Time-Barred Loan Claim | High Court | 14 Mar 2006 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |
2 | Henny Sutanto v Suriani Tani: Unlicensed Moneylending & Cheque Liability Dispute | High Court | 25 Apr 2005 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs and the default judgment she had obtained against the first defendant was set aside as irregular. |
3 | Ding Leng Kong v Mok Kwong Yue: Moneylender Act & Enforceability of Loans | High Court | 18 May 2003 | Plaintiff's claims allowed to the extent stated. First defendant’s counterclaim allowed. |