Hotel Operations

Hotel Operations is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2014 to 2014.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Hotel Operations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Tay Bing Wei (1 cases) Ian de Vaz (1 cases) Seng Yen Ping (1 cases)	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability(Jun 2014)
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Colin Liew (1 cases) Chia Voon Jiet (1 cases) Cavinder Bull SC (1 cases)	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Francis Xavier SC (1 cases) Winston Kwek Choon Lin (1 cases) Tng Sheng Rong (1 cases)	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Bogaars & Din0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Savliwala Fakhruddin Huseni (1 cases) Subramaniam Sundaram (1 cases)	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability(Jun 2014)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Hotel Operations, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Colin Liew0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Chia Voon Jiet0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Francis Xavier SC100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Cavinder Bull SC0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Winston Kwek Choon Lin100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Tng Sheng Rong100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Avinash Pradhan100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Rajaram Vikram Raja0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice10% relevance score	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply(May 2014)
Tay Bing Wei0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice30% relevance score	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability(Jun 2014)
Ian de Vaz0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	General Practice30% relevance score	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability(Jun 2014)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Hotel Royal v J M Pang: Flashover Incident, Electrical Maintenance, and Licensed Electrical Worker Liability	High Court	01 Jun 2014	Judgment for Plaintiff in part; Defendant to bear 70% of the loss, Plaintiff to bear 30% of the loss.
2	Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC Supply	Court of Appeal	29 May 2014	Appeal allowed with costs. Contracts discharged by frustration.