Riddick Undertaking
Riddick Undertaking is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 9 cases from 2015 to 2020.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Riddick Undertaking, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
| WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate | 2 cases22.2% of area |
| Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Tan Kok Quan Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Gabriel Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Riddick Undertaking, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Tan Thye Hoe Timothy0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Tan Chee Meng100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Peter Gabriel0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Goh Wei Wei0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| N Sreenivasan100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Partheban s/o Pandiyan100.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Toh Jia Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
| Dhillon Dinesh Singh0.00% success rate | 1 cases11.1% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 9 most recent judgments out of 9 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | - | 13 Aug 2020 | Unknown | |
| 2 | BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA Charges | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 17 Nov 2019 | Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact. |
| 3 | Ong Keh Choo v Paul Huntington Bernardo: Dispute over Option to Purchase Agreement | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 02 Sep 2019 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed. |
| 4 | NK Mulsan Co Ltd v INTL Asia Pte Ltd: Stay of Execution Application | High Court of Singapore | 07 Nov 2018 | Stay application dismissed |
| 5 | BNX v BOE: Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal and Implied Undertaking | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 25 Jun 2018 | Applications to adduce further evidence on appeal dismissed. |
| 6 | Koh Chee Tong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 12-Week Imprisonment for Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act Offences | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 08 Sep 2016 | Appeal dismissed. |
| 7 | Bunge SA v Indian Bank: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Undertaking | High Court | 29 Dec 2015 | Singapore proceedings stayed in favour of India as the more appropriate forum. |
| 8 | William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 15 Sep 2015 | Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there. |
| 9 | Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & Unconscionability | High Court | 10 Mar 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid. |