Variation of Consent Orders
Variation of Consent Orders is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 12 cases from 2010 to 2025.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Variation of Consent Orders, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| T L Yap Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Harry Elias Partnership LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Lee & Lee0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Engarde Legal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Temple Counsel LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Gurbani & Co LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Engelin Teh Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Winchester Law LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| R. Ramason & Almenoar0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Lee Bon Leong & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Variation of Consent Orders, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Kyle Leslie Sim0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Florence Ting0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Siow Itming0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Govintharasah s/o Ramanathan0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Linda Joelle Ong0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Anuradha d/o Krishan Chand Sharma100.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Sng Kheng Huat100.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Low Wan Kwong Michael0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Gulab Sobhraj0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
| Yap Teong Liang0.00% success rate | 1 cases8.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 12 most recent judgments out of 12 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XHG v XHH: Costs Order in Divorce Ancillary Matters | Family Law | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 13 Feb 2025 | Costs awarded to Wife; Husband to pay standard costs of S$5,000 and indemnity costs of S$2,000. |
| 2 | WRP v WRQ: Appeal on Variation of Consent Order for Matrimonial Asset Division and Maintenance | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 13 Feb 2024 | Appeal allowed in part. |
| 3 | WKM v WKN: Child Custody, Care and Control, and Judicial Interviews in Family Law | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Feb 2024 | Appeal Allowed |
| 4 | VUG v VUF: Appeal on Variation of Consent Order in Family Law Dispute | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 31 Oct 2023 | Appeal dismissed; the Disputed Consent Order is set aside with no order as to costs. |
| 5 | WAY v WAZ: Variation of Access Orders Appeal in Singapore Family Court | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 08 Jun 2022 | Mother's appeal dismissed; Father's appeal allowed. |
| 6 | - | 20 Jan 2022 | Unknown | |
| 7 | VSL v VSM: Appeals on Child Custody, Access, and Maintenance Variation | General Division of the High Court (Family Division) | 12 Oct 2021 | Appeals dismissed, but Clause 3e(d) varied to backdate monthly maintenance. |
| 8 | WHI v WHJ: Appeal for Variation of Consent Order in Divorce Proceedings | Family Justice Courts of the Republic of Singapore | 12 Oct 2017 | Appeal dismissed. |
| 9 | Seah Kim Seng v Yick Sui Ping: Variation of Consent Order and Division of Matrimonial Property | High Court | 28 May 2015 | Appeal dismissed. |
| 10 | AEF v AEG: Appeal to Vary Consent Order for Division of Matrimonial Assets | High Court | 29 Jun 2014 | Appeal dismissed. |
| 11 | Ng Irene v Tan Meng Heng Robin: Dispute over Variation of Divorce Order Regarding Matrimonial Asset Division | High Court | 22 May 2011 | Application to vary the Order of Court of 9 February 2010 granted to give effect to the proposed swap that she accepted. |
| 12 | Khoo Beng Kee Andrew v Willie Annie Prisila: Variation of Maintenance Order and Reinstatement of Insurance Policies | High Court | 19 Jan 2010 | Appeal dismissed; orders made on 20 November 2009 concerning the insurance policies were upheld. |