Second defendant

Second defendant is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 21 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 34 counsels. Through 15 law firms. Their track record shows a 47.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 16 complex cases, representing 76.2% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Second defendant has been represented by 15 law firms and 34 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Gregory Vijayendran Dhiviya Mohan Matthew Teo Ryan Loh Melissa Kue
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Cavinder Bull Adam Yusoff Maniam
Haridass Ho & Partners	1 case	Tan Boon Yong Thomas Ernita Osman
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Mak Wei Munn Jacqueline Chua Sin Yen
Eldan Law LLP	1 case	Daniel Koh Radika Mariapan
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Teo Weng Kie Shahira bte Mohd Anuar P Padman Aaron Wham
Lawrence Quahe & Woo LLC	1 case	Chenthil Kumarasingam Jeremy Nonis
M/s Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Kelvin Tan Jason Chen
KhattarWong	1 case	Chan Kia Pheng Sharon Lin
C Arul & Partners	1 case	Ooi Oon Tat Arul Chandran
Fabian & Khoo	1 case	Wong Yao Fang
Colin Ng & Partners LLP	1 case	Nazirah K Din Rasanathan s/o Sothynathan
Ramdas & Wong	1 case	Roslina Baba Ng Li-Yen
Engelin Teh & Partners	1 case	B M Singh Chan Jin Han
Independent Practitioner	1 case	Y R Jumabhoy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Second defendant's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 16 (76.2%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4.8%
Lost	66.2 parties avg	6.2	28.6%
Neutral	33.3 parties avg	3.3	14.3%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	4.8%
Won	104.8 parties avg	4.8	47.6%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2014	55.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	43.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	44.8 parties avg	4.8
2002	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Second defendant's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4.8%)	4.8%
Lost	6(28.6%)	28.6%
Neutral	3(14.3%)	14.3%
Partial	1(4.8%)	4.8%
Won	10(47.6%)	47.6%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	53,908,208.55	4,146,785.2713 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 113	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 112	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 121	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 21 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-195 26 Jul 2015	26 Jul 2015	Defendant	WonThe court declined to grant a Mareva injunction against the second defendant.
2	2015-sghc-124 29 Apr 2015	29 Apr 2015	Defendant	PartialLiability fixed at 15%. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2014-sghc-239 13 Nov 2014	13 Nov 2014	Defendant	LostThe court granted the plaintiff's application to inspect the accounting and other records of the Company. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2014-sghcr-12 18 Jun 2014	18 Jun 2014	Defendant	NeutralThe outcome for the second defendant is not explicitly stated in the judgment extract.
5	2014-sghc-81 20 Apr 2014	20 Apr 2014	Defendant	WonThe appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision to dismiss the plaintiffs’ application for security for costs was dismissed. The court ordered that costs here and below will be costs in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghc-55 30 Mar 2014	30 Mar 2014	Defendant	WonThe defendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2014-sghcr-6 10 Mar 2014	10 Mar 2014	Defendant	WonThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application to annul the Singapore bankruptcy order.
8	2013-sghcr-12 06 May 2013	06 May 2013	Defendant	WonThe second defendant's application to be struck out of the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim was allowed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2012-sghcr-17 06 Nov 2012	06 Nov 2012	Defendant	LostDamages assessed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2012-sghcr-15 26 Sep 2012	26 Sep 2012	Defendant	WonDefendant's application for security for costs was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	2012-sghc-36 20 Feb 2012	20 Feb 2012	Defendant, Respondent	WonJudgment in favor of the first and second defendants. Costs of $1,500 to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	2012-sghc-3 08 Jan 2012	08 Jan 2012	Defendant	NeutralThe second defendant was unrepresented and the judgment does not specify an outcome for them.
13	2011-sghc-223 04 Oct 2011	04 Oct 2011	Defendant	NeutralThe second defendant was not directly involved in the present application.
14	2010-sghc-136 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Respondent, Defendant	WonPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	2010-sghc-115 15 Apr 2010	15 Apr 2010	Defendant	DismissedPlaintiff's claim against the Second Defendant was struck out.
16	2010-sghc-112 13 Apr 2010	13 Apr 2010	Defendant	LostMareva injunction granted against the first, second, and fourth defendants on their assets up to the value of S$600,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17	2010-sghc-109 12 Apr 2010	12 Apr 2010	Defendant, Respondent	LostThe Assistant Registrar's decision to stay the plaintiff's action was reversed on appeal.
18	2002-sghc-227 26 Sep 2002	26 Sep 2002	Defendant	LostSecond defendant's application as a beneficiary was disallowed.
19	2002-sghc-101 05 May 2002	05 May 2002	Defendant	WonApplication against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	2001-sghc-381 30 Dec 2001	30 Dec 2001	Defendant	LostJudgment against the second defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the second defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	2000-sghc-33 07 Mar 2000	07 Mar 2000	Defendant	WonThe claim against the second defendant was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.