Third defendant

Third defendant is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 27 counsels. Through 11 law firms. Their track record shows a 47.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 16 complex cases, representing 94.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Third defendant has been represented by 11 law firms and 27 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Gregory Vijayendran Dhiviya Mohan Matthew Teo Ryan Loh Chandra Mohan s/o Rethnam Melissa Kue Gillian Hauw Hui Ying
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Cavinder Bull Adam Yusoff Maniam
Haridass Ho & Partners	1 case	Tan Boon Yong Thomas Ernita Osman
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 case	Teo Weng Kie Shahira bte Mohd Anuar P Padman Aaron Wham
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Lek Siang Pheng Benjamin Yam
Helen Yeo & Partners	1 case	Lek Siang Pheng
Mahtani & Co	1 case	Mahtani Bhagwandas L Devadason
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Josephine Choo Quek Kian Teck
Ramdas & Wong	1 case	Roslina Baba Ng Li-Yen
Engelin Teh & Partners	1 case	B M Singh Chan Jin Han
Independent Practitioner	1 case	Y R Jumabhoy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Third defendant's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.3
Complex Cases: 16 (94.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	66.0 parties avg	6.0	35.3%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5.9%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5.9%
Withdrawn	14.0 parties avg	4.0	5.9%
Won	85.3 parties avg	5.3	47.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2014	55.0 parties avg	5.0
2012	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2000	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Third defendant's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(35.3%)	35.3%
Neutral	1(5.9%)	5.9%
Partial	1(5.9%)	5.9%
Withdrawn	1(5.9%)	5.9%
Won	8(47.1%)	47.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	53,308,208.55	5,330,820.8610 cases	10

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 113	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	2 11	Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-195 26 Jul 2015	26 Jul 2015	Defendant	WonThe court declined to grant a Mareva injunction against the third defendant.
2	2015-sghc-124 29 Apr 2015	29 Apr 2015	Defendant	PartialLiability fixed at 15%. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2014-sghc-239 13 Nov 2014	13 Nov 2014	Defendant	LostThe court granted the plaintiff's application to inspect the accounting and other records of the Company. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2014-sghcr-12 18 Jun 2014	18 Jun 2014	Defendant	NeutralThe outcome for the third defendant is not explicitly stated in the judgment extract.
5	2014-sghc-81 20 Apr 2014	20 Apr 2014	Defendant	WonThe appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision to dismiss the plaintiffs’ application for security for costs was dismissed. The court ordered that costs here and below will be costs in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghc-55 30 Mar 2014	30 Mar 2014	Defendant	WonThe defendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2014-sghcr-6 10 Mar 2014	10 Mar 2014	Defendant	WonThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application to annul the Singapore bankruptcy order.
8	2012-sghcr-17 06 Nov 2012	06 Nov 2012	Defendant	LostDamages assessed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2012-sghc-36 20 Feb 2012	20 Feb 2012	Defendant, Respondent	WonJudgment in favor of the third defendant. Costs of $1,500 to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2011-sghc-196 01 Sep 2011	01 Sep 2011	Defendant	LostThe appeal against the order compelling the plaintiff to provide further and better particulars of its claim was dismissed.
11	2011-sghc-146 02 Jun 2011	02 Jun 2011	Defendant	LostThe third defendant's application to strike out parts of the plaintiff's claim was rejected due to being filed out of time.
12	2010-sghc-136 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Respondent, Defendant	WonPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	2010-sghc-109 12 Apr 2010	12 Apr 2010	Defendant, Respondent	LostThe Assistant Registrar's decision to stay the plaintiff's action was reversed on appeal.
14	2002-sghc-101 05 May 2002	05 May 2002	Defendant	WonApplication against the defendant was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	2001-sghc-381 30 Dec 2001	30 Dec 2001	Defendant	LostJudgment against the third defendant for $53.3 million due to conspiracy to injure by unlawful means and breaches of fiduciary duty. Declaration that the third defendant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of the plaintiff company with intent to defraud its creditors and that they were liable to the plaintiff company for the said $53.3m. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	2000-sghc-168 13 Aug 2000	13 Aug 2000	Defendant	WithdrawnMP Bank applied for leave to withdraw their claim against the third defendant, which was granted. MP Bank was ordered to pay costs to the third defendant on an indemnity basis.
17	2000-sghc-33 07 Mar 2000	07 Mar 2000	Defendant	WonThe claim against the third defendant was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.