Ling Das & Partners

Ling Das & Partners is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2023. The firm has handled 18 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 7 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and appellate practice. Their track record shows a 44.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 55.6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	12 cases	23.1% of total caseload	Experienced62.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 23.1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	11 cases	21.2% of total caseload	Experienced52.31% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 21.2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	19.2% of total caseload	Experienced55.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 19.2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	6 cases	11.5% of total caseload	Experienced66.88% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11.5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	7.7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7.7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	General Practice40.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	General Practice30.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	General Practice20.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1.9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90.00% relevance score	Ling Das & Partners has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1.9% of their total caseload.

Legal Team and Representation

Ling Das & Partners has 7 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 9 cases.

Counsel Name	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
S Thulasidas	9 cases	50.0% of firm's cases	2011 sghc 78(Mar 2011) 2011 sghc 62(Mar 2011) 2009 sghc 129(May 2009)
Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam	7 cases	38.9% of firm's cases	2022 sghca 34(Oct 2022) 2021 sghca 2(Mar 2021) 2021 sghc 33(Feb 2021)
S Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2023 sghc 334(Nov 2023)
Mendel Yap	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2021 sghc 33(Feb 2021)
S Thulasidass	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2002 sghc 139(Jul 2002)
Ling Koon Hean David	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2022 sghca 34(Oct 2022)
Yap Wei Xuan Mendel	1 cases	5.6% of firm's cases	2021 sghca 2(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ling Das & Partners's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 10 (55.6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	83.6 parties avg	3.6	44.4%
Lost	52.6 parties avg	2.6	27.8%
Partial	33.6 parties avg	3.6	16.7%
Neutral	24.0 parties avg	4.0	11.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ling Das & Partners's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	8(44.4%)	44.4%
Lost	5(27.8%)	27.8%
Partial	3(16.7%)	16.7%
Neutral	2(11.1%)	11.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3766227.43	209234.8615 cases	15

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	011 11	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2003	021 21	Lost: 2 cases (9.5%) Won: 1 cases (4.8%)
2007	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	02 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	02 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2014	01 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	011 11	Partial: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 1 cases (9.1%)
2022	01 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	01 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Represented Parties

List of parties represented by Ling Das & Partners in various cases

Party Name	Role	Cases	Outcomes
Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte LtdDefendant, Respondent, Defendant, Respondent, Appellant Won (5)Neutral (2)Lost (1)	Defendant, Respondent, Defendant, Respondent, Appellant	8 cases	Won (5)Neutral (2)Lost (1)
GTMS Construction Pte LtdRespondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim, Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant Partial (2)Won (3)Lost (1)	Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim, Respondent, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendant	6 cases	Partial (2)Won (3)Lost (1)
Lenny Arjan SinghRespondent, Defendant Lost (1)	Respondent, Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Swee Hong Engineering Construction Pte LtdDefendant Partial (1)	Defendant	1 case	Partial (1)
Lee Ah PohDefendant Lost (1)	Defendant	1 case	Lost (1)
Ng Huat Engineering Pte LtdPlaintiff, Applicant Lost (1)	Plaintiff, Applicant	1 case	Lost (1)