Ho Chien Mien

Ho Chien Mien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in performance bond and civil practice. Their track record shows a 24.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated expertise across 103 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	10 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of Loss	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Related Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contingent Claim	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Peremptory orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of time and liquidated damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Delay in completion	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Failure to complete	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of work	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Back charges	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scope of Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale and Purchase Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Maintenance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Management and Strata Management Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disobedience of order of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measurement contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employers’ duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mechanical and Electrical Design	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Design Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fitness for Purpose Warranty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defective Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sovereign Immunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Election or Affirmation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Appeals	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architect's Certificate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bonds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Chien Mien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Chien Mien has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	9 cases	45% of cases	Rich Construction v Greatearth Construction: Proof of Debt in Liquidation & Settlement Agreement Interpretation(May 2024) ICOP Construction v Tiong Seng: Construction Dispute over Microtunneling Works(Jan 2024) ICOP Construction v. Tiong Seng: Microtunnelling Dispute over Contract Termination and Delay Claims(Oct 2022)
Allen & Gledhill	7 cases	35% of cases	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Assessment of Damages for Misrepresentation in Façade Work Contract(Aug 2007) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Amendment of Pleadings and Mitigation of Loss(May 2006) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Security for Costs & Company Residency(Oct 2003)
Allen and Gledhill	4 cases	20% of cases	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project(May 2005) Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice: Case Management of Overlapping Actions(Jan 2005) Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Misrepresentation, Contract Breach & Damages(Nov 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Chien Mien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 5 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.6 parties avg	2.6	35%
Neutral	26.7 parties avg	6.7	10%
Partial	72.8 parties avg	2.8	35%
Won	53.2 parties avg	3.2	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Chien Mien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(33%)	33%
Neutral	2(10%)	10%
Partial	7(33%)	33%
Won	5(24%)	24%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	17,672,411.51	1,606,582.8611 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rich Construction v Greatearth Construction: Proof of Debt in Liquidation & Settlement Agreement Interpretation 30 May 2024 China State Construction Engineering Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Claimant)Partial	30 May 2024	China State Construction Engineering Corporation Limited (Singapore Branch) (Claimant): Partial Allowance of ClaimClaim allowed in part; quantum to be proved is $46,608.79 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	ICOP Construction v Tiong Seng: Construction Dispute over Microtunneling Works 01 Jan 2024 Tiong Seng Civil Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Partial	01 Jan 2024	Tiong Seng Civil Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim allowed in part. ICOP is to pay TSCE general damages of $60,965.16 for ICOP's delays. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	ICOP Construction v. Tiong Seng: Microtunnelling Dispute over Contract Termination and Delay Claims 11 Oct 2022 Tiong Seng Civil Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	11 Oct 2022	Tiong Seng Civil Engineering (Pte) Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Partial JudgmentPartial judgment in favor of the Defendant for SGD 402,790.46
4	Global Switch v Arup: Design Contract Dispute over Data Center Cooling & Power 09 May 2019 Global Switch (Property) Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	09 May 2019	Global Switch (Property) Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $1,000 awarded for Arup’s breach of its obligations regarding the provision of additional cooling. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Millenia Pte Ltd v Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd: Building Façade Defects and Liability 10 Sep 2018 Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dragages et Travaux Publics (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	10 Sep 2018	Dragages Singapore Pte Ltd (formerly known as Dragages et Travaux Publics (Singapore) Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD for Singapore.
6	Smile Inc v OP3 International: Defective Construction & Flooding at Suntec City Clinic 04 Oct 2017 Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	04 Oct 2017	Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed.
7	JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 02 Dec 2010 Gammon Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	02 Dec 2010	Gammon Pte Ltd (Respondent): Interim Injunction upheldThe interim injunction restraining JBE from receiving payment under the Bond was upheld.
8	Gammon v JBE Properties: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 27 Apr 2010 Gammon Pte Limited (Plaintiff)Won	27 Apr 2010	Gammon Pte Limited (Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted to restrain the defendant from receiving payment from BNP Paribas Singapore on a performance bond until further order.
9	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages 08 Apr 2008 Jurong Town Corp (Respondent)Partial	08 Apr 2008	Jurong Town Corp (Respondent): Damages awarded in partDamages awarded for additional expenses incurred by JTC as a result of WSL’s fraudulent misrepresentations, viz, item (c), item (d) and item (e).
10	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Assessment of Damages for Misrepresentation in Façade Work Contract 13 Aug 2007 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant)Partial	13 Aug 2007	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant): Partial JudgmentDefendant's claims allowed except for S$1,036,983.00 (administration of contract fee to JCPL) and $3,003.00 (costs for use of site). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Amendment of Pleadings and Mitigation of Loss 17 May 2006 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	17 May 2006	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to disallow the amendment was dismissed.
12	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Misrepresentation & Contract Rescission in Construction Project 12 May 2005 Jurong Town Corp (Appellant)Won	12 May 2005	Jurong Town Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; contract validly terminated; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice: Case Management of Overlapping Actions 24 Jan 2005 Publicis Eureka Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	24 Jan 2005	Publicis Eureka Pte Ltd (Defendant): OtherOrder made regarding sequence of actions and admission of evidence.
14	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Misrepresentation, Contract Breach & Damages 21 Nov 2004 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant)Lost	21 Nov 2004	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim for damages for misrepresentation was dismissed.
15	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Security for Costs & Admission of Fresh Evidence in Interlocutory Appeals 30 Mar 2004 Jurong Town Corp (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2004	Jurong Town Corp (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedJTC's appeal against the High Court's decision to deny security for costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Wishing Star Ltd v Jurong Town Corp: Security for Costs & Company Residency 07 Oct 2003 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2003	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal for security of costs was dismissed.
17	IBM v UNIG: Breach of Contract & E-Marketplace System Dispute 28 Mar 2003 UNIG Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	28 Mar 2003	UNIG Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Counterclaim DismissedUNIG’s counterclaim dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Credit Agricole v Rekasaran: Injunction Against Note Exchange & Asset Disposal 25 Apr 2001 Baden-Wuttembergishe Bank AG (Plaintiff)Neutral	25 Apr 2001	Baden-Wuttembergishe Bank AG (Plaintiff): Application by intervener dismissedIntervener's application to vary the injunction was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Soil-Build v Sin Yam Huat: Claim for Monies Due Under Architect's Certificate 27 Nov 2000 Soil-Build (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2000	Soil-Build (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $368,205.34 plus interest, stayed pending determination of any counterclaim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Hsiang Ding v Singasia: Forum Selection & Contract Law in Granite Supply Dispute 24 Oct 2000 Singasia Investments Pte Ltd (formerly known as Shinkeikin Aluminium (Pte) Limited) (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	24 Oct 2000	Singasia Investments Pte Ltd (formerly known as Shinkeikin Aluminium (Pte) Limited) (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's application to stay the action was overturned.