Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd

Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Wong & Leow LLC	1 case	Andy Leck Shaun Lee Jennifer Fong Lee Cheng Gerald Kuppusamy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Astrata (Asia Pacific) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-61 17 Mar 2011	17 Mar 2011	Defendant	NeutralDirections made for keyword searches to be conducted on seized electronic documents to identify discoverable information.
2	2010-sghc-361 09 Dec 2010	09 Dec 2010	Defendant	PartialOrders granted to the defendant were ordered to stand, except for the part of paragraph 2 that allowed the defendant to use the information and documents disclosed or produced pursuant to the search orders for purposes of any claim against the plaintiff as well as the Tridex Companies in and outside Singapore. The court ordered costs at 90% to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, the deduction of 10% being the costs attributed to the arguments on the Riddick principle. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.