B

B is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 9 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

B has been represented by 9 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Salem Ibrahim & Partners	1 case	Yap Teong Liang
Wee Raayah & Partners	1 case	Kesavan Nair
Harry Elias Partnership	1 case	Koh Tien Hua
Justicius Law Corporation	1 case	Nicholas Lazarus
Sim & Wong LLC	1 case	Devi Haridas
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	1 case	Philip Jeyaretnam
Ismail Hamid & Co	1 case	Ismail Hamid
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 case	Chandra Mohan s/o K Nair
Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva LLP	1 case	Naresh Mahtani Elizabeth Xue

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of B's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	37.5%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	12.5%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	12.5%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	25.0%
	13.0 parties avg	3.0	12.5%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of B's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Neutral	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Partial	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	2(25.0%)	25.0%
	1(12.5%)	12.5%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2009-sghc-192 25 Aug 2009	25 Aug 2009	Third Party	LostClaim against the house purchased in the third party’s name was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2008-sghc-225 27 Nov 2008	27 Nov 2008	Other	Unknown
3	2008-sghc-11 23 Jan 2008	23 Jan 2008	Plaintiff	LostApplication to set aside the costs award was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	2007-sghc-221 16 Dec 2007	16 Dec 2007	Co-Respondent	NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for the co-respondent.
5	2007-sghc-141 30 Aug 2007	30 Aug 2007	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part, specifically in relation to the notice of additional assessment issued in respect of the gains from their sale of the Waterside unit.
6	2002-sghc-290 08 Dec 2002	08 Dec 2002	Appellant	LostThe appellant's appeal against conviction was dismissed.
7	2002-sghc-210 11 Sep 2002	11 Sep 2002	Plaintiff	WonThe plaintiffs were appointed the sole guardians of the infant and granted leave to bring the infant with them to Australia to reside at 5 Doyle Street, Morley, Perth, Western Australia. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	2002-sghc-62 27 Mar 2002	27 Mar 2002	Respondent	WonApplication for stay of all proceedings in Singapore granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.