Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited

Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited has been represented by 2 law firms and 20 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
4.1
Complex Cases
7 (100.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost34.0 parties avg
Partial34.3 parties avg
Won14.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202324.0 parties avg
202224.0 parties avg
201914.0 parties avg
201815.0 parties avg
201714.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Binderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(42.9%)
Partial3(42.9%)
Won1(14.3%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD250.004 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20232
11
20221
2
20191
1
20181
1
20171
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
22 Oct 2023
Appellant, PlaintiffPartialAppeal allowed in part; costs orders in relation to the respondents’ post-transfer costs set aside.
09 Feb 2023
Appellant, PlaintiffLostAppeal dismissed; nominal damages of $1,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18 Dec 2022
PlaintiffLostPlaintiffs' claim for damages was dismissed.
06 Feb 2022
PlaintiffLostBinderless Coal Briquetting Company Pty Limited's claim for damages for its wasted expenditure and its claim for damages for the loss of a chance to expand the Tabang Plant’s capacity to 3 MTPA and profit therefrom are dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
08 Jan 2019
PlaintiffWonThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
28 Aug 2018
Respondent, PlaintiffPartialAppeal dismissed in part; the question of whether BCBCS had the ability to fund KSC on its own is remitted to the Court for determination.
24 Jul 2017
PlaintiffPartialThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.