Chin Bay Ching
Chin Bay Ching is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Chin Bay Ching has been represented by 4 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Allen and Gledhill | 1 case |
| Raj Kumar & Rama | 1 case |
| Mak and Partners | 1 case |
| Derrick Wong & Lim BC LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Chin Bay Ching's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.3
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 14.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
| 113.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2011 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 113.0 parties avg |
| 2005 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2004 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Chin Bay Ching's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(25.0%) |
| Partial | 1(25.0%) |
| Won | 1(25.0%) |
| 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 205,000.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 1 |
| 2009 | 1 1 |
| 2005 | 1 1 |
| 2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
19 May 2011 | Defendant | PartialSpecific performance of the agreement was ordered. The claim for rectification costs was allowed in the agreed sum of $410,000. The claim for liquidated damages was dismissed in part, except for the sum of $141,922.19 already deducted. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Aug 2009 | Other | Unknown |
16 May 2005 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed with costs. Security for costs to be refunded to the appellant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed. |
18 Nov 2004 | Defendant | LostThe court granted the mandatory injunction against the defendant, requiring him to retract the letters. |