Eng Chiet Shoong

Eng Chiet Shoong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 80.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Eng Chiet Shoong has been represented by 2 law firms and 11 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eng Chiet Shoong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
5.4
Complex Cases
4 (80.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost36.0 parties avg
Partial16.0 parties avg
Won13.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201826.0 parties avg
201616.0 parties avg
201516.0 parties avg
201413.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eng Chiet Shoong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(60.0%)
Partial1(20.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD666,666.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20181
2
20161
1
20151
1
20141
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
27 Sep 2018
DefendantLostClaim partially dismissed; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27 Sep 2018
DefendantLostThe court held that both cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel operate to prevent the defendants from arguing that there was an overarching agreement for the plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses incurred by the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12 Jul 2016
Appellant, RespondentPartialThe Engs are entitled to compensation for work done with regard to Project Plaza (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 Jul 2015
DefendantLostCounterclaim dismissed except for agreed management fees.
11 Aug 2014
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed; the MCST is required to carry out the repairs immediately and bear the costs of the appeal and proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).