Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd

Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 10 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.3
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Partial12.0 parties avg
Won32.3 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202413.0 parties avg
202012.0 parties avg
201912.0 parties avg
201812.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hilton International Manage (Maldives) Pvt Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Partial1(25.0%)
Won3(75.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD50,000.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20241
1
20201
1
20191
1
20181
1

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
08 May 2024
PlaintiffWonSun Travels was found in contempt of court and ordered to pay a fine of $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
05 Jul 2020
Respondent, PlaintiffWonThe respondent's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed.
23 Dec 2019
RespondentWonThe appeal against the decision to allow questions regarding assets in the Maldives during examination of judgment debtor proceedings was dismissed.
13 Mar 2018
PlaintiffPartialLimited permanent anti-suit injunction granted in relation to the March Judgment, a declaration that the Awards were final, valid and binding on the parties, and a declaration that the defendant’s claim in the Maldivian action was in respect of disputes between the plaintiff and defendant that have arisen out of or in connection with the Agreement and any consequential proceedings (including appeals) would be in breach of the arbitration agreement contained in the Agreement. It was also made clear that nothing in the order would prevent the defendant from objecting to the recognition or enforcement of the Awards in accordance with Maldivian law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.