Holland Leedon Pte Ltd

Holland Leedon Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Holland Leedon Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Low Poh Ling Steven Chong
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Lee Eng Beng Low Poh Ling Steven Chong
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Davinder Singh Adrian Tan Valerie Tan Angie Han Vanita Jegathesan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Holland Leedon Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Holland Leedon Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2009-sgca-29 30 Jun 2009	30 Jun 2009	Applicant	LostHolland Leedon's application to vary the injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2007-sgca-6 12 Feb 2007	12 Feb 2007	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	2006-sghc-74 04 May 2006	04 May 2006	Defendant	WonDefendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application for an injunction (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).