Housing and Development Board
Housing and Development Board is a statutory board in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 42.9% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Housing and Development Board has been represented by 5 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 2 cases |
Wee Swee Teow and Co | 1 case |
HDB (Legal Group) | 1 case |
Wong Partnership | 1 case |
Attorney-General’s Chambers | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Housing and Development Board's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.1
- Complex Cases
- 4 (57.1%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 19.0 parties avg |
Partial | 23.5 parties avg |
Won | 33.3 parties avg |
13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 19.0 parties avg |
2016 | 14.0 parties avg |
2015 | 23.5 parties avg |
2014 | 14.0 parties avg |
2004 | 22.5 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Housing and Development Board's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 1(14.3%) |
Partial | 2(28.6%) |
Won | 3(42.9%) |
1(14.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 5,000.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 1 1 |
2016 | 1 1 |
2015 | 2 11 |
2014 | 1 1 |
2004 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2019 | Other | NeutralThe Housing and Development Board was a non-party. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
27 Oct 2016 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was partially allowed with orders made for document access. |
29 Nov 2015 | Respondent | WonThe HDB's decision to compulsorily acquire the flat was upheld. |
26 Nov 2015 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with specific orders made regarding sinking fund transfers and the appointment of accountants. |
21 Dec 2014 | Respondent | WonApplication for leave to file an application for a quashing order was dismissed. Applicants to pay costs of $15,000 and disbursements amounting to $7,000 to HDB. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
22 Aug 2004 | Other | Unknown |
06 Apr 2004 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claims was granted, and the action was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |