IIa Technologies Pte Ltd

IIa Technologies Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

IIa Technologies Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	Meryl Koh Junning Tony Yeo Soo Mong Loo Fang Hui Yeo Javier Chiew Jing Yi Tony Yeo Meryl Koh Javier Yeo
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	2 cases	Davinder Singh Srruthi Ilankathir Hanspreet Singh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of IIa Technologies Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of IIa Technologies Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Partial	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgca-5 16 Feb 2023	16 Feb 2023	Appellant, Defendant	WonThe appeal against the High Court's decision was allowed, and the patent SG 872 was revoked.
2	2020-sghc-140 21 Jul 2020	21 Jul 2020	Defendant	LostDefendant's counterclaim that SG 872 and SG 508 were invalid was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2020-sghc-26 06 Feb 2020	06 Feb 2020	Defendant	PartialSG 508 found invalid and not infringed.
4	2018-sghcr-13 26 Aug 2018	26 Aug 2018	Defendant, Applicant	LostRequests 3, 5, and 6 disallowed. Request 4(ii) disallowed. Request 2 (limited) and Request 4(i) granted.
5	2017-sghcr-16 18 Oct 2017	18 Oct 2017	Defendant, Respondent, Applicant	PartialDefendant's application for further and better particulars of the Statement of Claim, the Particulars of Infringement and the Reply and Defence to Counterclaim was partially unsuccessful.