Johnny Lian Tian Yong

Johnny Lian Tian Yong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Johnny Lian Tian Yong has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	N. Sreenivasan SC N Sreenivasan Claire Tan Claire Tan Kai Ning Andrew Heng
Phoenix Law Corporation	1 case	Uthayasurian s/o Sidambaram Suriya Prakash Uthayasurian Derek Wong Kim Siong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Johnny Lian Tian Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Won	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Johnny Lian Tian Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	400,000.00	200,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-292 12 Oct 2023	12 Oct 2023	Appellant, Plaintiff	PartialAppeal allowed in part, reversing the District Judge's decision to allow the respondents’ counterclaims against the appellant.
2	2018-sghc-169 25 Jul 2018	25 Jul 2018	Defendant, Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim	WonJudgment for Plaintiff-in-Counterclaim; S$400,000 plus interest awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2016-sghc-206 27 Sep 2016	27 Sep 2016	Defendant, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; Paragraph 26(d) of the SOC was struck out. Costs of S$5,000 (excluding reasonable disbursements) to be paid by the Plaintiffs to the Defendant. Costs of S$2,400 ordered by the AR for the hearing below and previously paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs was to be returned to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.