Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd

Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd has been represented by 5 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
UniLegal LLC	1 case	Tham Lijing Balasubramaniam Ernest Yogarajah Stephanie Tan Chelva R Rajah
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Tan Cheng Han
Arfat Selvam Alliance LLC	1 case	Tan Cheng Han Ernest Balasubramaniam Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam
Tan Cheng Han	1 case	Tan Cheng Han
ASG Law Corporation	1 case	Tan Cheng Han Ernest Balasubramaniam Rajvant Kaur

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50.0%)	50.0%
Neutral	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-44 11 Feb 2015	11 Feb 2015	Plaintiff	NeutralDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff’s action dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2009-sghc-234 19 Oct 2009	19 Oct 2009	Defendant	WonThe plaintiff's application was dismissed, in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2008-sgca-47 30 Nov 2008	30 Nov 2008	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the decision of the Judge that the MC is entitled to repair and/or maintain the Right of Way is set aside.
4	2007-sghc-32 04 Mar 2007	04 Mar 2007	Defendant	LostThe court dismissed the defendant's arguments and granted the declaration sought by the plaintiff.
5	2005-sgca-22 11 Apr 2005	11 Apr 2005	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs; security deposit released to the respondent to account for its costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2004-sghc-220 27 Sep 2004	27 Sep 2004	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostLee Tat's prayers for declarations and injunctions were dismissed due to issue estoppel.