LIM MEY LEE SUSAN

LIM MEY LEE SUSAN is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 16.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

LIM MEY LEE SUSAN has been represented by 3 law firms and 12 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	5 cases	Lee Eng Beng Sim Kwan Kiat Amy Seow Paul Tan Wilson Zhu Jonathan Cheong Elizabeth Wu Christine Huang Tammy Low Tammy Low Wan Jun
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	Bernice Loo
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Amy Seow Paul Tan Alyssa Leong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of LIM MEY LEE SUSAN's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of LIM MEY LEE SUSAN's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 31	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-129 12 May 2015	12 May 2015	Respondent	PartialThe court reviewed the Assistant Registrar's taxation of costs, adjusting the amounts allowed for the inquiry before the disciplinary committees and the appeal to the Court of Three Judges. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2013-sghc-122 27 Jun 2013	27 Jun 2013	Appellant	LostAppeal against the Disciplinary Committee's decision was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
3	2011-sgca-66 29 Nov 2011	29 Nov 2011	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2011-sghc-133 25 May 2011	25 May 2011	Applicant	LostApplication for a Quashing Order, a Prohibiting Order, and a Declaration were all dismissed.
5	2011-sghc-132 25 May 2011	25 May 2011	Applicant	LostThe applicant's application for discovery was dismissed.
6	2011-sghc-131 25 May 2011	25 May 2011	Applicant	WonLeave granted to apply for a Quashing Order and a Prohibiting Order.