Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd

Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Siraj Omar SC Siraj Omar See Chern Yang Hendroff Fitzgerald L Audie Wong Cheng Siew Teng Po Yew Fitzgerald Hendroff
Premier Law LLC	1 case	See Chern Yang Teng Po Yew

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.8
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20.0%
Lost	26.0 parties avg	6.0	40.0%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20.0%
Won	19.0 parties avg	9.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2016	18.0 parties avg	8.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	54,000.00	18,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-38 27 Oct 2022	27 Oct 2022	Respondent, Defendant	LostAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2021-sghc-283 07 Dec 2021	07 Dec 2021	Defendant	DismissedAll claims against Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd were dismissed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	2017-sghc-140 14 Jun 2017	14 Jun 2017	Defendant	WonApplication for specific discovery of the Affidavit was dismissed on the ground of litigation privilege.
4	2017-sghcr-1 18 Jan 2017	18 Jan 2017	Defendant	PartialThe first defendant's application for specific discovery was granted in part, but not for the Affidavit.
5	2016-sghc-23 21 Feb 2016	21 Feb 2016	Defendant, Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; both applications (determination of law and striking out) granted. Costs of $5,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).