Mukherjee Amitava
Mukherjee Amitava is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Mukherjee Amitava has been represented by 1 law firm and 10 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Mukherjee Amitava's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 6.0
- Complex Cases
- 6 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 15.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 36.3 parties avg |
Partial | 15.0 parties avg |
17.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 36.3 parties avg |
2019 | 17.0 parties avg |
2018 | 15.0 parties avg |
2017 | 15.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Mukherjee Amitava's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(16.7%) |
Neutral | 3(50.0%) |
Partial | 1(16.7%) |
1(16.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 3 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
02 Mar 2020 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific orders made against this defendant in this judgment. |
11 Feb 2020 | Respondent, Defendant in Counterclaim | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. |
08 Jan 2020 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party in the provided text. |
11 Mar 2019 | Defendant in Counterclaim | Unknown |
05 Sep 2018 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed against the company, but dismissed regarding the joinder of the Longsheng directors. Costs awarded for the proceedings below and the appeal in favour of the appellant and against the Company in the aggregate sum of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Dec 2017 | Plaintiff | LostApplication to inspect company records was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |