Norasharee Bin Gous

Norasharee Bin Gous is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 62.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Norasharee Bin Gous has been represented by 5 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
I.R.B Law LLP	2 cases	Mohamed Baiross Anand George
Carson Law Chambers	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy
K K Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
Amarick Gill LLC	1 case	Amarick Gill Amarick Gill Singh

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Norasharee Bin Gous's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.8
Complex Cases: 5 (62.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	88.8 parties avg	8.8	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	313.3 parties avg	13.3
2021	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Norasharee Bin Gous's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sgca-51 06 Jul 2022	06 Jul 2022	Appellant	LostApplication for stay of execution dismissed.
2	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
5	2021-sgca-42 20 Apr 2021	20 Apr 2021	Applicant	LostThe Court dismissed the application to re-open the appeal.
6	2020-sghc-189 13 Sep 2020	13 Sep 2020	Defendant	LostThe court upheld the original conviction of the accused. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2017-sgca-17 09 Mar 2017	09 Mar 2017	Appellant	LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
8	2016-sghc-102 31 May 2016	31 May 2016	Defendant	LostFound guilty of abetting, by instigation, Yazid to traffic in not less than 120.90g of diamorphine.