nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd

nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Chia Su Min Rebecca Kenneth Lim Tao Chung Chua Xinying Peh Aik Hin Kristy Tan Jasmine Tham Edwin Tong Tham Chuen Min Jasmine Tan Jianmin Valerie Tay Valerie Tay Yie Shan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	20.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of nTan Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Neutral	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Partial	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	1(20.0%)	20.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,276,735.40	638,367.702 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sgca-69 18 Oct 2018	18 Oct 2018	Appellant	LostThe appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed.
2	2017-sghc-207 21 Aug 2017	21 Aug 2017	Plaintiff	PartialJudgment for the Plaintiff; the Defendant has to pay the Plaintiff an additional $1,276,735.40 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2013-sghc-177 16 Sep 2013	16 Sep 2013	Other Party	NeutralNCA was the entity seeking representation by the applicant.
4	2013-sgca-27 24 Mar 2013	24 Mar 2013	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs.
5	2012-sghc-136 28 Jun 2012	28 Jun 2012	Defendant	WonInterlocutory judgment with costs on its counterclaim for value-added fee. An inquiry shall be held by the Registrar to determine the amount of VAF with costs of such inquiry reserved to the Registrar together with interest on the VAF assessed. The VAF amount when assessed shall be paid from the balance of the Deposit. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.