Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “NEPAMORA”

Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “NEPAMORA” is a other in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “NEPAMORA” has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Chan Leng Sun LLC	1 case	Chan Leng Sun
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	2 cases	Lim Wei Ming Keith Seah Lee Guan Collin Reuben Tan Wei Jer Joel Raj Moosa
Helmsman LLC	1 case	Teo Ke-Wei Ian Huang Peide Chen Zhida

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “NEPAMORA”'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	27.0 parties avg	7.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Owner and/or Demise Charterer of the vessel “NEPAMORA”'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sgca-84 19 Aug 2021	19 Aug 2021	Appellant, Defendant	WonAppeal allowed; costs order below is reversed in favor of the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2016-sghc-100 19 May 2016	19 May 2016	Respondent	WonUnconditional leave to defend granted. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.