Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs is a other in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Plaintiffs has been represented by 6 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Joseph Tan Jude Benny	1 case	Tan Hui Tsing
Ang & Partners	1 case	Chan Leng Sun Belinda Ang
C Arul and Partners	1 case	Ooi Oon Tat C Arul
C Arul & Partners	1 case	Ooi Oon Tat C Arul
Ari Goh and Partners	1 case	Francis Goh
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Trevor Ivan D'cruz

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Plaintiffs's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	50.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	16.7%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2000	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Plaintiffs's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	5,000.001 cases	1
USD	3,800,000.00	3,800,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2000	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sghc-35 22 Feb 2006	22 Feb 2006	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiffs' claim for damages arising from the defendants’ alleged wrongful detention of or interference with the plaintiffs’ equipment was dismissed.
2	2003-sghc-254 20 Oct 2003	20 Oct 2003	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; time for service of the Statement of Claim extended. The Statement of Claim is to stand as served on 18 March 2003.
3	2001-sghc-198 23 Jul 2001	23 Jul 2001	Appellant	WonPlaintiffs' appeal was allowed and the order of court dated 13 October 2000 was set aside. Costs of the appeal and costs below was fixed at $5,000 payable by the defendants to the plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2001-sghc-124 03 Jun 2001	03 Jun 2001	Plaintiff	PartialOrders of court of 25 May varied to the extent that the defendants` solicitors were directed to preserve the documents in their possession pending discovery. The other items that were stated in the order of court of 25 May but not in the defendants` solicitors` possession must be preserved by the defendants themselves pending discovery. Vessel to be released on the provision of security in the sum of US$3.8m plus interest over three years at 8% and costs at S$350,000.
5	2000-sghc-23 14 Feb 2000	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiffs' writ was set aside.
6	2000-sghc-22 14 Feb 2000	14 Feb 2000	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiffs' claim for breach of charterparty was dismissed as the action was found to be ultra vires.