Ravi s/o Madasamy

Ravi s/o Madasamy is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 18.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 18.2% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ravi s/o Madasamy has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ravi s/o Madasamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
4.2
Complex Cases
2 (18.2%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost94.4 parties avg
Won23.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202412.0 parties avg
202333.3 parties avg
2022211.5 parties avg
202012.0 parties avg
201813.0 parties avg
201712.0 parties avg
201612.0 parties avg
201512.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ravi s/o Madasamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost9(81.8%)
Won2(18.2%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD5,200.005 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20241
1
20231
3
20222
11
20201
1
20181
1
20171
1
20161
1
20151
1

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
30 May 2024
RespondentLostThe respondent was ordered to be struck off the roll. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
07 Nov 2023
RespondentLostMr. Ravi was sentenced to 21 days of imprisonment for contempt of court.
25 Apr 2023
RespondentLostThe court denied Mr. Ravi's request to have his voluntary undertaking considered as part of his suspension period.
30 Mar 2023
RespondentLostFound guilty of multiple allegations of contempt of court.
27 Jul 2022
DefendantWonThe court agreed with the Disciplinary Tribunal that the first charge against Ravi s/o Madasamy was not made out.
22 Jun 2022
OtherLostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12 Oct 2020
PlaintiffLostThe plaintiff’s application for leave to commence judicial review under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Rules of Court is dismissed.
19 Sep 2018
Defendant, RespondentWonAppeal allowed; no monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
09 Jul 2017
PlaintiffLostOriginating Summons dismissed; ordered to bear the defendant's costs fixed at $6,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26 Oct 2016
RespondentLostThe Respondent is prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a period of two years (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28 Apr 2015
RespondentLostLaw Society's application for leave to appoint a Disciplinary Tribunal was granted.