Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd

Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 37.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TSMP Law Corporation	1 case	Thio Shen Yi Gordon Lim Nicholas Ngo Matthias Goh
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Patrick Ang Jared Kok Chai Wei Han
Rajah & Tann	2 cases	Ronald Choo Quentin Loh Corrinne Chia
Rajah and Tann	2 cases	Ronald Choo Ronald Choo Han Woon Corrinne Chia

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.6
Complex Cases: 3 (37.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	119.0 parties avg	19.0	12.5%
Neutral	211.0 parties avg	11.0	25.0%
Partial	119.0 parties avg	19.0	12.5%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2017	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2016	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samwoh Resources Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Neutral	2(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Won	4(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	191,034.00	63,678.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sghc-262 27 Nov 2018	27 Nov 2018	Defendant	LostCourt directed that discounts for lack of control and lack of free transferability were not to be applied to the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares.
2	2017-sghc-52 12 Mar 2017	12 Mar 2017	Defendant	PartialThe court determined the reference date for the valuation of the plaintiffs' shares to be 17 February 2016.
3	2016-sghc-140 28 Jul 2016	28 Jul 2016	Defendant	NeutralThe court made an order for the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs.
4	2006-sghc-43 13 Mar 2006	13 Mar 2006	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	2005-sghc-112 23 Jun 2005	23 Jun 2005	Respondent	WonApplication dismissed with costs fixed at $750 each for the two creditors which had appeared at the hearing to oppose the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2005-sghc-50 09 Mar 2005	09 Mar 2005	Supporting Creditor	NeutralSupporting creditor; disbursements for filing affidavits awarded.
7	2004-sghc-83 26 Apr 2004	26 Apr 2004	Plaintiff	WonDamages assessed at $190,284 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2003-sghc-69 30 Mar 2003	30 Mar 2003	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).