Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rodyk & Davidson | 1 case |
Rodyk and Davidson | 2 cases |
WongPartnership LLP | 1 case |
Wong Partnership LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.4
- Complex Cases
- 3 (60.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 24.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 23.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2010 | 22.5 parties avg |
2006 | 14.0 parties avg |
2005 | 14.0 parties avg |
2004 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(40.0%) |
Partial | 1(20.0%) |
Won | 2(40.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2010 | 2 11 |
2006 | 1 1 |
2005 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
25 Aug 2010 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; Partial Award and Correction Award remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration on the issue of Econ-NCC Joint Venture’s counterclaim for damages. |
25 Aug 2010 | Respondent | PartialPartial Award remitted to Arbitrator for reconsideration of substantial completion date and reasons for dismissing contra charges. |
05 Jul 2006 | Respondent, Defendant | WonAppeal dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 May 2005 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Nov 2004 | Defendant | LostThe defendants' appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |