Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 60.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 6 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
3.4
Complex Cases
3 (60.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost24.0 parties avg
Partial13.0 parties avg
Won23.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201022.5 parties avg
200614.0 parties avg
200514.0 parties avg
200414.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Partial1(20.0%)
Won2(40.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.003 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20102
11
20061
1
20051
1
20041
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
25 Aug 2010
AppellantWonAppeal allowed; Partial Award and Correction Award remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration on the issue of Econ-NCC Joint Venture’s counterclaim for damages.
25 Aug 2010
RespondentPartialPartial Award remitted to Arbitrator for reconsideration of substantial completion date and reasons for dismissing contra charges.
05 Jul 2006
Respondent, DefendantWonAppeal dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 May 2005
AppellantLostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16 Nov 2004
DefendantLostThe defendants' appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).