Soh Kim Seng
Soh Kim Seng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Soh Kim Seng has been represented by 3 law firms and 10 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tan LLP | 1 case |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
| Rajah & Tan Singapore LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Soh Kim Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 16.5
- Complex Cases
- 4 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 119.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 214.0 parties avg |
| Won | 119.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 19.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 119.0 parties avg |
| 2017 | 119.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 119.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Soh Kim Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(25.0%) |
| Partial | 2(50.0%) |
| Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 0.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
26 Nov 2019 | Appellant | PartialThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group. |
27 Nov 2018 | Defendant | LostCourt directed that discounts for lack of control and lack of free transferability were not to be applied to the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares. |
12 Mar 2017 | Defendant | PartialThe court determined the reference date for the valuation of the plaintiffs' shares to be 17 February 2016. |
28 Jul 2016 | Defendant | WonThe court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs. |