Sun Electric Pte Ltd

Sun Electric Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 10 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Sun Electric Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 14 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TanLim Partnership	1 case	Lim Chee San
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	Koh Swee Yen Daniel Liu Zhao Xiang Daniel Liu Andrew Pflug Eden Li Zoe Kok Daniel Liu Zhaoxiang Lim Yangyu
Ravindran Associates LLP	4 cases	Chan Wenqiang Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy Jevon Louis Alvin Tan Alvin Lim
Ravindran Associates	1 case	Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy Jevon Louis

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sun Electric Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 10 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.8 parties avg	4.8	50.0%
Partial	44.0 parties avg	4.0	40.0%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sun Electric Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	4(40.0%)	40.0%
Won	1(10.0%)	10.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,811,452.53	362,290.515 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 22	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%) Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sghc-101 06 May 2021	06 May 2021	Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	LostDamages awarded against Sun Electric Pte Ltd in the amount of $1,495,452.53 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2020-sghc-18 21 Jan 2020	21 Jan 2020	Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim	LostDisclosure Orders granted against Sun Electric Pte Ltd.
3	2020-sghcr-1 21 Jan 2020	21 Jan 2020	Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialPlaintiff ordered to furnish security for costs totaling $315,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2019-sgca-51 25 Sep 2019	25 Sep 2019	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; no damages awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2019-sghcr-11 26 Aug 2019	26 Aug 2019	Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialThe Plaintiff was ordered to file further and better particulars after receipt of the Defendants’ answers to the Interrogatories.
6	2019-sghcr-4 18 Feb 2019	18 Feb 2019	Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialThe Plaintiff's application for further and better particulars was partially granted and partially dismissed.
7	2019-sgca-4 09 Jan 2019	09 Jan 2019	Respondent, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs and disbursements to the Appellants. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	2018-sghc-264 02 Dec 2018	02 Dec 2018	Plaintiff	PartialNominal damages of $1,000 awarded for Menrva's breach of sub-clause (a) of the Consultancy Agreement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	2017-sghc-232 27 Sep 2017	27 Sep 2017	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the High Court does not have original jurisdiction under the Patents Act to revoke a patent by way of a counterclaim in infringement proceedings. The court assumes the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	2017-sghcr-6 03 May 2017	03 May 2017	Plaintiff, Applicant	LostThe Plaintiff's application to strike out parts of the Defence and Counterclaim and the Particulars of Objection is declined.