Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin

Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 58.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin has been represented by 5 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Advocatus Law LLP	1 case	Christopher Anand s/o Daniel
Carson Law Chambers	4 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy
K K Cheng Law LLC	3 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
Regency Legal LLP	1 case	Chitra Balakrishnan Mahendran s/o Mylvaganam

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 15.0
Complex Cases: 7 (58.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	1116.2 parties avg	16.2	91.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2023	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2022	321.3 parties avg	21.3
2021	49.0 parties avg	9.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Syed Suhail bin Syed Zin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(91.7%)	91.7%
Partial	1(8.3%)	8.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	35,000.00	8,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 4	Lost: 4 cases (400.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sgca-11 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Appellant, Applicant	LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing.
2	2023-sghc-346 04 Dec 2023	04 Dec 2023	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
3	2022-sgca-58 03 Aug 2022	03 Aug 2022	Appellant, Claimant	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
4	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
7	2021-sghc-270 29 Nov 2021	29 Nov 2021	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff.
8	2021-sgca-53 13 May 2021	13 May 2021	Applicant	LostPersonal costs order of $5,000 against his counsel, Mr. Ravi (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	2021-sghc-31 07 Feb 2021	07 Feb 2021	Applicant	LostThe applicant's application for judicial review was dismissed.
10	2020-sgca-122 22 Dec 2020	22 Dec 2020	Appellant, Applicant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; leave granted to commence judicial review proceedings solely on the scheduling ground.
11	2020-sgca-101 15 Oct 2020	15 Oct 2020	Applicant, Appellant	LostThe applicant's review application was dismissed as he failed to produce sufficient material to demonstrate a miscarriage of justice.
12	2016-sghc-8 25 Jan 2016	25 Jan 2016	Defendant	LostAccused convicted on the trafficking charge and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.