Thio Keng Thay

Thio Keng Thay is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Thio Keng Thay has been represented by 1 law firm and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Cavinder Bull Cavinder Bull SC Tan Sih Si Daniel Cai Daniel Cai Zhenyang Kelly Lua

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thio Keng Thay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thio Keng Thay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,308,645.48	654,322.742 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-69 30 Mar 2022	30 Mar 2022	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $1,308,645.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2020-sgca-86 27 Aug 2020	27 Aug 2020	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed; awarded costs for the appeal fixed at $50,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2019-sghc-175 25 Jul 2019	25 Jul 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant	PartialJudgment for the Plaintiff on the breach of contract claim, with the quantum of damages to be determined at a later stage. The court found that the defendant breached the SPA because the Property contained both general defects and lift defects. The plaintiff was found to be in breach of the defects liability clause. Monetary amount to be determined in the second tranche of the trial. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.