TT International Ltd

TT International Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

TT International Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Ong Pei Chin Chan Hock Keng Alvin Yeo Lawrence Foo Foo Xian Yao
Wong Partnership LLP	1 case	Alvin Yeo Chang Man Phing Lawrence Foo Tan Yee Siong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of TT International Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50.0%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Won	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of TT International Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Neutral	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2014-sgca-25 15 May 2014	15 May 2014	Appellant	WonThe appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2013-sghc-177 16 Sep 2013	16 Sep 2013	Respondent	LostTT International Ltd opposed the application, which was ultimately allowed.
3	2012-sgca-53 26 Sep 2012	26 Sep 2012	Respondent	NeutralThe Court directed the parties to reach an agreement on the appropriate amount of professional fees for the scheme manager; otherwise, the fees will be assessed by a High Court Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2012-sgca-9 30 Jan 2012	30 Jan 2012	Respondent	LostAppeals allowed; the court set aside the sanction of the Scheme and ordered Further Meetings to be called for the same Scheme to be put to a re-vote, subject to the directions as explained above.