Tung Yu-Lien Margaret
Tung Yu-Lien Margaret is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 19 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 30.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tung Yu-Lien Margaret has been represented by 3 law firms and 19 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC | 4 cases |
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tung Yu-Lien Margaret's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.2
- Complex Cases
- 3 (30.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 23.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 27.0 parties avg |
Partial | 13.0 parties avg |
Stayed | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 44.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 13.0 parties avg |
2020 | 33.0 parties avg |
2011 | 13.0 parties avg |
2010 | 17.0 parties avg |
2009 | 13.0 parties avg |
2008 | 35.7 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tung Yu-Lien Margaret's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(20.0%) |
Neutral | 2(20.0%) |
Partial | 1(10.0%) |
Stayed | 1(10.0%) |
Won | 4(40.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 8,000.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 2 12 |
2011 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
2009 | 1 1 |
2008 | 2 12 |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
01 Jul 2021 | Respondent, Defendant | WonTung's applications to strike out Lin's appeals were allowed, and Lin was ordered to pay her $40,000 in costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
25 Oct 2020 | Defendant | WonThe application to dismiss the plaintiff's application was granted. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
26 Jul 2020 | Defendant, Intervener | WonSummons No 1281 of 2020 allowed; the plaintiff should procure the second defendant to reimburse the first defendant for the Fees that she had paid on behalf of the second defendant. |
22 Jul 2020 | Defendant | StayedThe first defendant’s counterclaim in OS 1446 is stayed pending the outcome of Suit 1048, on the condition that the validity of the impugned notices and resolutions is suspended for the duration of the stay. |
30 May 2011 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the sum of $650,000 awarded by the Judge under Section 1 of BC 247 substituted with a sum of $250,000. The appellants are to have the costs of this appeal, which we fix at $15,000 inclusive of reasonable disbursements. The usual consequential orders are to follow. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Sep 2010 | Third Party, Respondent | WonThird party claim against Margaret Tung dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Oct 2009 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; judgment against the Respondent for damages and costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Aug 2008 | Third Parties | NeutralThe outcome for this party is not specified in the judgment extract. |
08 Jul 2008 | Defendant | LostThe defendant's application to strike out the defamation action was dismissed. |
26 Feb 2008 | Third Party | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. |